Dinâmicas do pluralismo jurídico na implementação da lei contra a violência doméstica - Lei 29/2009: caso do Distrito Municipal Ka-Mubukwane, na Cidade de Maputo

Abstract

The present work is entitled: Dynamics of Legal Pluralism in the Implementation of the Law Against Domestic Violence. It is an anthropological analysis of a political public. That has as general objective, to understand the dynamics resulting from the implementation of Law 29/2009. In particular, it intends to (i) demonstrate the contributions that the new Law brought violence to combat; (ii) explain the prejudices developed in the implementation of the Law (iii) and analyze the social representations of the implementers and beneficiaries of the Law 29/2009. The study was carried out in the Ka-Mubukwane Municipal District, in the City of Maputo. For the materialization of this work, bibliographic and documentary research was chosen, semi-structured interviews, informal conversations and direct observation. The universe interviewed was made up of implementers (judges, lawyers, bailiffs, police and judges community leaders and religious leaders) and beneficiaries (a group made up of men and women that seek out instances dedicated to the management of domestic violence). The study found that there are several interpretations of Law 29/2009, since its approval and its implementation, for implementers and beneficiaries. The Law fills certain abuses by men against women. However, there is also a perception of some fear in its implementation, since, there are still perceptions that the Law in resolving the The problem of violence is causing another problem, divorce cases. The conclusion reached is that Law 29/2009, the Law Against Domestic Violence, being a public policy, has known different reactions since its approval that goes from acceptance, resistance to manipulation. On the other hand, it is a policy that has created a new form of behavior in men and women, since it is for everyone, reducing in this way domestic violence, but not eliminating it in its entirety, as there are setbacks between the law and other forms of rights. (TRADUÇÃO NOSSA)