Análise comparativa dos métodos de avaliação e gestão de riscos no combate a incêndios – método William T.Fine. Vs método Integrado: caso de estudo: Serviço Nacional de Salvação Pública - SENSAP

Abstract

Risk Assessment and Management (AGR) is the basis for the prevention of accidents and occupational diseases. It must be carefully carried out and tailored to the company's reality, ensuring that all relevant risks are identified identified and the respective prevention measures indicated, as well as guaranteed the verification of their effectiveness, the due recording of results and evaluation at regular intervals. The main objective of the work placement was to make a comparative study of the comparative study of the efficiency of Risk Assessment and Management by applying the methods of William T.Fine VS Integrated method in fire fighting in SENSAP. This comparison was preceded by two phases, namely: Data collection collection of data on AGR by the method William T.Fine, and these are from the internship work of Nelson de Rogerio João Abucar, and the AGR by the method Integrated method made by the author of this paper. The AGR by the Integrated method took into account several aspects, such as: Identification of Hazards and Risks in the firefighting sub activities, suggestions regarding risk control measures, residual risk calculations, and calculation of the justification index of the applicability of the proposed measures. After carrying out the risk assessment through the Integrated method, and comparison with the William T.Fine method, it can be stated that both methods methods have applicability in the sector in question, and it was also found that the Integrated Integrated method is a more complete Risk Assessment and Management method more dynamic and that allows the participation of workers in the identification and resolution of problems in the companies, increasing awareness, minimizing and reducing occupational accidents and diseases in companies